Donate!

English

17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (B) - The “test” before the multiplication of the loaves

When Jesus sees the large crowd, he said to Philip, “Where can we buy enough food for them to eat?”  He said this to test him, because he himself knew what he was going to do.”  The miracle of the multiplication of the loaves and the fishes is not a miracle that Jesus works simply to fix a problem that he and the disciples find themselves in.  This miracle is set up as a “test” for Philip and the other disciples.  What is the test?  Jesus is seeing how the disciples respond to a situation that is beyond their capabilities.  When Philip assesses the situation, he judges that there is nothing that they can do because what would be required is too expensive.  He says, “Two hundred days’ wages worth of food would not be enough for each of them to have a little.”  Andrew, likewise, looks at the five barley loaves and two fish that they have and says, “what good are these for so many?”  Their resources couldn’t make a dent in addressing the problem or the great need before them, so they think there is nothing they can do.  Why bother to give it because it won’t make a difference!  We can say that there is a fear that if they give what they have, it will be wasted or cause an even bigger problem than the one before them at the moment.  In the first reading from the second Book of Kings, when a man brings to Elisha twenty barley loaves as his “first fruits” offering, Elisha’s servant makes a similar objection when Elisha tells him to give it to the people to eat.  The servant says, “How can I set this before a hundred people?”  He is afraid of being embarrassed by the meagerness of the offering - that it won’t suffice.  The servant in the first reading and the disciples see the little that they have, and they resist giving when the Lord is proposing to them an opportunity to give.  But the Lord is saying at this moment, “the little that you have, the little that you give, will be enough. In fact, it will be more than enough, if you give it to me.”  The hesitation of the disciples to give and their method of calculation is contrasted with the boy who freely offers his five barley loaves and two fish in an effort to help those in need.  Barley loaves were the staple food of the poor.  The poor, little child, is the one who freely gives, without counting the cost.  Elisha’s insistence to the servant, “Give it to the people to eat” as well as the Lord’s command, “Have the people recline” in response to Andrew’s objection, is an invitation to have faith.    Jesus receives the little that is offered to him and gives thanks to God before distributing the loaves to the people.  When we look at the the little that we have, do we give thanks to God?  Without this fundamental attitude of gratitude for whatever we are given, recognizing that all we have is a gift from God, we will cling to what we have.  The problem is that we focus on the lack and not on God.  So we are stuck and feel helpless.  Charitable giving has its roots in gratitude.  If we don’t see what we have as a gift from God (and give thanks), we will not be moved to give.  We’ll be afraid to give.  The boy who gives the loaves and the fish is a witness to someone who is “poor in spirit”, i.e., someone who recognizes that everything he has is a gift, and, therefore, he is free to give. 

          I want to share a story about how my family and my father (whose name is also Philip) were put to the test in a way similar to the disciples.  It was an event that in many ways changed the direction of my life.  I grew up in a family of devout, practicing Catholics.  We lived in the country, and our parish did not have a Catholic school.  In this rural county in Pennsylvania, the nearest Catholic school was over a half-hour away, and there was no busing.  So I went to the local public school.  Being Italian-Catholic in an area where most of the families were German Protestants, our family was very much in the minority.  I didn’t “fit it” culturally speaking.  It hurt and I didn’t understand why I wasn’t part of the “in” friend group of the popular kids.  I did well in school but didn’t enjoy school very much.  By the time I got to high school, things got much worse.  I wasn’t being challenged academically, the teachers did not require much homework, and the bullying and the lack of discipline in the school only increased.  My parents could tell that I was suffering. 

          A friend of our family who, like my parents, was an educator in the public school system, suggested that my parents look into sending me to a private preparatory school for boys.  The school was an elite boarding school about an hour away from where we lived.  It was a place where the rich and upper-class sent their sons.  Talk about a very different culture than the working class community of farmers and factory workers where I lived!  And the tuition - it was no different than going to a major university and paying for room and board.  There was no way my parents could afford to send me to this school.  Would I fit in any more there than at the public school I attended?  My parents and I took a tour of the school and met with the admissions director.  I filled out the application, took the admissions test, and a few weeks later found out I was accepted.  The school was very impressive and the people were very nice, but the school just seemed “out of our league.”  We met with the admissions director again, and I’m sure he could read the the expression on my parents’ faces.  He said to them, “Don’t worry, Mr. and Mrs. Forlano.  Your son will do fine here.  He belongs here.”  And then he insisted,  “We want your son to come here.  I will talk with the business office, and we will make it work for you.”

          It would be a financial sacrifice to pay for tuition compared with going to public school for free, but my parents made the commitment.  They stepped out in faith.  I transferred into the school half-way through my first year of high school.  It was a bit of a culture shock for me, and I was very homesick my first weeks there.  But with the discipline of a dress code and an organized schedule of meals, classes, chapel services, athletics, study time, recreation, and even “lights out” for bedtime, I began to thrive.  What I appreciated most at the time was that those who excelled academically were not made fun of but were respected and looked up to.  Looking back, it was the “human formation” in a family environment or “culture” where virtue, respect, and academic excellence were fostered that made a difference in my life and allowed me to flourish as a student and a person.  I formed in that school good life habits that made the challenge of going away to college much less challenging.  Even entering the structure and schedule of the seminary when I entered four years after college was not a hard transition for me because of the formation I received at the boarding school.  I trace so many blessings in my life back to that act of faith before the “impossible” that my parents made for me.

          A good educational foundation that “educates the whole person” and is not just concerned with academics and job training (in order to get a well-paying job), is what will make the next generation succeed, not just in the work force, but in life.  Almost forty years after I transferred into that private high school, the Lord has put me in a position where I can offer to families (not much different than the family I came from) the same opportunity I had for a better education.  Many people in our community do not think a Catholic education is possible for them because “they cannot afford it.”  They think that what they have to give to their child’s education is not enough, so they don’t even consider it.  I am saying to anyone who thinks that way the same thing Mr. Reese, the admissions director, said to my parents, “Don’t worry, your son or daughter will do well at St. Charles.  They belong here.  We want them to come here, and we will make it possible for you.”  I’m insisting and inviting them to see what the Lord will do - how the Lord will bless them and their children abundantly if they respond to this opportunity.  My parents were very grateful for that invitation and opportunity that was given to them and to me.  It wasn’t easy to make that commitment, but I am so grateful that they did. 

          In the first reading, the man brought to Elisha the “first fruits” of his harvest.  The “first fruits” is the first portion of the harvest.  It is given to God as an act of thanksgiving and trust.  It was usually sacrificed or burnt on the altar.  It looks like it is being wasted.  But this gesture says, “Lord, I recognize that you give me everything.  I trust that you provide for all my needs.  I trust you so much that I can give and still know that I’ll have more than enough to eat.  You provide for all my needs and more.”  We understand tithing or what we give to the church in the same way.  We keep Sunday as a day of rest dedicated to the Lord for the same reason.  I don’t have to work all the time in order to survive or to provide for my family.  I can rest on the first day, and you Lord, will provide for all my needs.  Tithing and charitable giving are acts of thanksgiving which, when done in faith, reveal God’s presence and deepen our faith in his providential care for us.  Where is the Lord challenging us today in this regard?  Where is he “putting us to the test”?  Where is he asking us to give and to trust in areas that to our eyes seem impossible?  Let’s not let the little we have and our worldly calculation get in the way of the Lord feeding us and those entrusted to our care.